Re: [PATCH qemu 2/2] dump: Only use the makedumpfile flattened format when necessary

Stephen Brennan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-debuggers,org.nongnu.qemu-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Marc-André Lureau <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 2:03 PM Marc-André Lureau
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 4:31 AM Stephen Brennan
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Stephen Brennan <[email protected]> writes:
>> > > Marc-André Lureau <[email protected]> writes:
>> > >> I am a bit reluctant to change the dump format by default. But since the
>> > >> flatten format is more "complicated" than the "normal" format, perhaps we
>> > >> can assume all users will handle it.
>> > >>
>> > >> The change is probably late for 8.1 though..
>> > >
>> > > Thank you for your review and testing!
>> > >
>> > > I totally understand the concern about making the change by default. I
>> > > do believe that nobody should notice too much because the normal format
>> > > should be easier to work with, and more broadly compatible. I don't know
>> > > of any tool which deals with the flattened format that can't handle the
>> > > normal format, except for "makedumpfile -R" itself.
>> > >
>> > > If it's a blocker, I can go ahead and add a new flag to the command to
>> > > enable the behavior. However there are a few good justifications not to
>> > > add a new flag. I think it's going to be difficult to explain the
>> > > difference between the two formats in documentation, as the
>> > > implementation of the formats is a bit "into the weeds". The libvirt API
>> > > also specifies each format separately (kdump-zlib, kdump-lzo,
>> > > kdump-snappy) and so adding several new options there would be
>> > > unfortunate for end-users as well.
>> > >
>> > > At the end of the day, it's your judgment call, and I'll implement it
>> > > how you prefer.
>> >
>> > I just wanted to check back on this to clarify the next step. Are you
>> > satisfied with this and waiting to apply it until the right time? Or
>> > would you prefer me to send a new version making this opt-in?
>> >
>>
>> Nobody seems to raise concerns. If it would be just me, I would change
>> it. But we should rather be safe, so let's make it this opt-in please.
>>
>>
>
> Alex, Daniel, Thomas .. Do you have an opinion on changing the dump format?
>
> Stephen, do you have a new version of the patches to make it opt-in?

Thanks for the reminder, I did have a start on the patches, but they're
not quite ready to share just yet. I'm learning about the QMP command
JSON schemas, which I'll need to update. I ended up receiving a new work
laptop which disrupted my work. I'll try to get a new patch series out
during my Wednesday (US Pacific time) workday.

Thanks,
Stephen
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.