Re: [PATCH v5 00/36] Private Memory NUMA Nodes

Gregory Price <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:53:06 -0400
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-debuggers,dev.linux.lists.damon,dev.linux.lists.driver-core,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-cxl,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID <amJGUuBZ2857QjDB@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 02:08:31PM +0530, Arun George/Arun George wrote:
> On 21-07-2026 01:03 am, Gregory Price wrote:
> > Changes Since V4
> > ================
> >   - dropped compressed ram example from series
> >       - will submit separately if this moves forward
> 
> We intend to test this series on a compression capable CXL expander 
> hardware. Since compressed ram example (cram) is not part of this 
> series, how do you suggest to do that? Do you have a version of cram 
> module compatible with this series?
> 
> ~Arun

Hi Arun,

I dropped it from the base series because i want to try to move forward
with this without RFC.  The compressed service itself will be a separate
submission after I get decent signal on whether this will be accepted.

I plan to RFC the new setup for compressed ram this a bit later, but I
will share my working branch with you for testing.

~Gregory