Re: [PATCH v24 05/12] dt-bindings: arm: Document reboot mode magic
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,dev.linux.lists.mfd |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: - [Medium] Incorrect tuple validation of a 2D `uint32-array`, applying outer array constraints and invalid property-level type `$ref`s to inner elements, breaking validation and dropping the `minimum` constraint. -- --- Patch [5]: [PATCH v24 05/12] dt-bindings: arm: Document reboot mode magic --- commit 27b283c27fa751f1b79c98734e61c56bbcfb0f0f Author: Shivendra Pratap <[email protected]> dt-bindings: arm: Document reboot mode magic This commit adds bindings to describe vendor-specific reboot modes in the PSCI SYSTEM_RESET2 call. The values defined here correspond to valid parameters for vendor-specific reset types. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml > index 6e2e0c5518411..7d6a86690a2e5 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml > @@ -98,6 +98,41 @@ properties: [ ... ] > + patternProperties: > + "^mode-.*$": > + minItems: 1 > + maxItems: 3 > + items: > + - description: arg1 (vendor-specific SYSTEM_RESET2 reset_type) > + allOf: > + - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 > + - minimum: 0x80000000 > + - description: arg2 (cookie_lo in 2-cell form, cookie_hi in 3-cell form) > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 > + - description: arg3 (cookie_lo in 3-cell form) > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 [Severity: Medium] Will this schema correctly validate the property values? Since dt-schema parses device tree arrays as 2D arrays, applying JSON Schema items list validation to the outer array evaluates the entire inner tuple as a single element against the schema for arg1. This regression can cause dt_binding_check to reject valid device trees because it ends up validating a 1xN array against uint32, which expects a 1x1 matrix. Because JSON Schema ignores minimum constraints when applied to an array, is it possible this silently bypasses the minimum constraint of 0x80000000? Should this pattern property reference /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array with the element constraints applied natively under it? -- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803-arm-psci-system_reset2-vendor-reboots-v24-0-889281373870@oss.qualcomm.com?part=5