Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Add exynos5515-wdt compatible data

Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,dev.linux.lists.sashiko-reviews,org.kernel.vger.linux-watchdog
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Aiden,

On 8/18/26 08:53, [email protected] wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] The `drv_data_exynos5515` variant includes `QUIRK_HAS_PMU_AUTO_DISABLE` but fails to define `.disable_reg`, resulting in PMU register corruption at offset 0x0.
> - [High] The `drv_data_exynos5515` variant uses an INT_EN register for masking but fails to set `.mask_reset_inv = true`, inverting the watchdog masking logic.
> --
> 
Please either address or explain why those are non-issues.

Guenter

> --- Patch [2]: [PATCH v2 2/2] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Add exynos5515-wdt compatible data ---
> commit fd223d0c16451bec63089d85a77c3b012b8f28ed
> Author: Aiden Isik <[email protected]>
> 
> watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: Add exynos5515-wdt compatible data
>      
> Add driver data for the Exynos5515 SoC's watchdog timer.
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
>> index e31f93db05096..7299dfdb0c099 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
>> @@ -232,6 +232,16 @@ static const struct s3c2410_wdt_variant drv_data_exynos5420 = {
>>   		  QUIRK_HAS_PMU_RST_STAT | QUIRK_HAS_PMU_AUTO_DISABLE,
>>   };
>>   
>> +static const struct s3c2410_wdt_variant drv_data_exynos5515 = {
>> +	.mask_reset_reg = EXYNOSAUTOV920_CLUSTER0_NONCPU_INT_EN,
> 
> [Severity: High]
> This variant uses an INT_EN register for masking but omits .mask_reset_inv.
> Could this cause the watchdog masking logic to be inverted?
> 
> Looking at s3c2410wdt_mask_wdt_reset(), the logic evaluates to false when
> unmasking if .mask_reset_inv is not set to true:
> 
> s3c2410wdt_mask_wdt_reset() {
> 	...
> 	const bool val_inv = wdt->drv_data->mask_reset_inv;
> 	const u32 val = (mask ^ val_inv) ? mask_val : 0;
> 	...
> 	ret = regmap_update_bits(wdt->pmureg, wdt->drv_data->mask_reset_reg,
> 				 mask_val, val);
> 
> Does this mean it will write a 0 when unmasking, disabling the reset output
> instead of enabling it?
> 
>> +	.mask_bit = 2,
>> +	.rst_stat_reg = EXYNOS5_RST_STAT_REG_OFFSET,
>> +	.rst_stat_bit = 24,
>> +	.quirks = QUIRK_HAS_WTCLRINT_REG | QUIRK_HAS_PMU_MASK_RESET | \
>> +		  QUIRK_HAS_PMU_RST_STAT | QUIRK_HAS_PMU_AUTO_DISABLE | \
> 
> [Severity: High]
> Since QUIRK_HAS_PMU_AUTO_DISABLE is set but .disable_reg is omitted, will
> .disable_reg default to 0x0?
> 
> During initialization and suspend, s3c2410wdt_disable_wdt_reset() applies
> updates to wdt->drv_data->disable_reg:
> 
> s3c2410wdt_disable_wdt_reset() {
> 	...
> 	ret = regmap_update_bits(wdt->pmureg, wdt->drv_data->disable_reg,
> 				 mask_val, val);
> 
> Could this unintentionally corrupt bit 2 at PMU offset 0x0?
> 
>> +		  QUIRK_HAS_DBGACK_BIT,
>> +};
>> +
> 
> [ ... ]
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.