Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation/arch/x86/amd-debugging: Add section about delay_suspend
Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260806014151.GFanPmX5VhBUG_6DLS@fat_crate.local> |
On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 12:54:04AM +0200, Daniel Gibson wrote: > That document mainly talks about s2idle issues and lists issues that have > been quirked in the past, so IMHO it fits there? Did you not read the first sentence of that document? > Also, Mario Limonciello (of AMD) suggested documenting it there in: > https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/[email protected]/ Maybe he needs to read the first sentence of that document too. > However, if there's a specific Wiki you think would be appropriate to > document this in, I should probably document it there as well. You have a pretty good commit message in 428b9fd2dce5 ("platform/x86/amd/pmc: Add delay_suspend module parameter") You have a bugzilla entry, you have a mailing list thread, you have a module param documentation. How much more do you need to document this? People should be able to use search engines or AI, right? The problem with adding some hints as to how suspend can be fixed on some laptops is that we'll open the floodgates. Do you know how many laptops need quirks and fixes for suspend? In any case, this doc is not for that. Sorry. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette