Re: [PATCH v7 17/36] KVM: x86: Allow KVM master clock mode when TSCs are offset from each other
Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.xenproject.lists.xen-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026, David Woodhouse wrote: > From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]> > > Previously, a guest writing different TSC values on different vCPUs could > force KVM out of master clock mode. With this change, only a frequency > mismatch disables master clock. The only ways for non-master-clock mode > to happen now are archaic hardware without a TSC-based clocksource, a > VMM that sets different TSC frequencies across vCPUs, or a guest using > the legacy MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME (which could be addressed in future by > simply updating tsc_timestamp more frequently rather than falling out of > master clock mode entirely). > > Running at a different frequency would lead to a systemic skew between > the clock(s) as observed by different vCPUs due to arithmetic precision > in the scaling. So that should indeed force the clock to be based on the > host's CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW instead of being in masterclock mode where it > is defined by the guest TSC. > > But when the vCPUs merely have a different TSC *offset*, that's not a > problem. The offset is applied to that vCPU's kvmclock->tsc_timestamp > field, and it all comes out in the wash. It's not though? The value stored in kvmclock->tsc_timestamp is per-VM, not per-vCPU, when using the master clock. It's a little easier to see once the master clock TSC isn't shoved into host_tsc: do { seq = read_seqcount_begin(&ka->pvclock_sc); use_master_clock = ka->use_master_clock; if (!use_master_clock) continue; if (!kvm_get_time_and_clockread(&kernel_ns, &host_tsc)) { use_master_clock = false; continue; } master_tsc = ka->master_cycle_now; master_ns = ka->master_kernel_ns; } while (read_seqcount_retry(&ka->pvclock_sc, seq)); ... if (use_master_clock) { hv_clock.tsc_timestamp = kvm_read_l1_tsc(v, master_tsc); hv_clock.system_time = master_ns + v->kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset; } else { hv_clock.tsc_timestamp = tsc_timestamp; hv_clock.system_time = kernel_ns + v->kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset; } To allow different offsets, KVM would need to track a per-vCPU offset to the master clock and apply that in kvm_guest_time_update() (and maybe other places?). Which is doable, but it's not clear to me why we'd want to support that (though I haven't fully processed the back half ot his series, so it's very possible I'm missing something obvious).