Re: [PATCH] docs: pt_BR: Reorganize process/index.rst to follow english structure

Daniel Pereira <[email protected]> writes:

> The main index.rst file for the pt_BR translation was grouping all
> translated process documents directly in its toctree, which frequently
> caused patch collisions among contributors.
>
> Following Jonathan Corbet's suggestion, this patch introduces a new
> pt_BR/process/index.rst that mirrors the subsection structure of the
> English Documentation/process/index.rst. The translated documents are
> now organized into their respective categories, rather than a single
> flat list.
>
> The root pt_BR/index.rst now simply references process/index.
>
> This matches the upstream categorization and significantly reduces
> merge conflicts for future pt_BR translations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Pereira <[email protected]>
> ---
>  Documentation/translations/pt_BR/index.rst    |  27 +----
>  .../translations/pt_BR/process/index.rst      | 104 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/pt_BR/process/index.rst

OK, this is what I wanted to see.  One complaint:

[...]

> diff --git a/Documentation/translations/pt_BR/process/index.rst b/Documentation/translations/pt_BR/process/index.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..5cecc0300
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/translations/pt_BR/process/index.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +.. raw:: latex
> +
> +	\renewcommand\thesection*
> +	\renewcommand\thesubsection*
> +
> +.. _process_index_pt_BR:

I continue my hopeless quest of trying to convince people not to add
these useless top-of-file labels; all they do is add clutter to the
text.

I have gone ahead and applied the patch so that people working on
translations have the new base to work on for 7.4.  But I took out that
label.

(I have doubts about the LaTeX boilerplate too, but left it there).

Thanks,

jon