Re: [PATCH 0/7] docs/zh_TW: remove duplicated maintainer contact information
葉宸佑 <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKspUhLo__Y4WV-VuJoWXKEoXwx1bv15kh2e_8pNKvPqOS8LNw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 12:43:39PM +0800, Weijie Yuan wrote: > By the way, this is something that occurred to me as well: for articles > that were converted directly from Simplified Chinese, do we really have > grounds to say that the original authors should be responsible for the > Traditional Chinese versions? I tend to think not. That is the part I felt least comfortable about while preparing this, so it is good to hear you reached the same conclusion independently. Someone who wrote a zh_CN translation years ago did not sign up to answer questions about a character-converted zh_TW copy of it. > Has anyone objected to multiple commits in this series sharing almost > the same commit message? Just a thought. Fair point. The shared paragraph is there so each patch stands alone in the log, but seven near-identical messages does read oddly. If this needs a respin for any other reason I will differentiate them; I would rather not resend seven patches for wording alone. Chen-Yu