Re: [PATCH 2/9] EDAC/versalnet: Add NULL check for mci in remove_one_mc()
Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Sun, 2 Aug 2026 11:46:23 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-edac,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260802184623.GAam-Qf9-yes1DkNkl@fat_crate.local> |
On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 10:49:38PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
> If a controller's configuration specifies an unrecognized bus width,
When can that happen?
We did figure out that controllers cannot be non-contiguous.
> init_one_mc() returns 0 but skips allocating priv->mci[ctl_num], leaving
> it NULL. On module unload or probe failure, remove_one_mc() is called for
> all controllers and unconditionally dereferences priv->mci[i], causing a
> kernel panic.
>
> Add a NULL pointer check for mci before dereferencing it.
>
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000390
> Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] SMP
> Hardware name: Xilinx Versal NET VNX (DT)
> pc : mc_remove+0x34/0x88
> lr : mc_remove+0x4c/0x88
> Call trace:
> mc_remove+0x34/0x88
> platform_remove+0x2c/0x70
> device_remove+0x48/0x7c
> device_release_driver_internal+0x1c8/0x224
> device_driver_detach+0x18/0x28
> unbind_store+0xb4/0xb8
How did you trigger this?
The commit message needs to explain the scenario this can happen in.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette