Re: [PATCH] arm64/efi: Do not call EFI runtime services preemptibly under SW PAN
Will Deacon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-efi,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <anXMug2_-vZl_pZ7@willie-the-truck> |
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 05:01:44PM -0700, gus bourg wrote: > From: Gus Bourg <[email protected]> > > When PAN is emulated by switching TTBR0_EL1, arch_efi_call_virt_setup() > installs the EFI mm into TTBR0_EL1 via uaccess_ttbr0_enable(), and only a > return from exception ever puts it back: check_and_switch_context() skips > the register write by design ("Defer TTBR0_EL1 setting for user threads to > uaccess_enable() when emulating PAN"), and __switch_to() does not touch it > either. switch_mm() updates only thread_info->ttbr0. > > Since commit a5baf582f4c0 ("arm64/efi: Call EFI runtime services without > disabling preemption") the runtime call is preemptible, so the EFI worker > can now be scheduled out inside that window. An involuntary preemption is > harmless, because __swpan_entry_el1()/__swpan_exit_el1() save and restore > the state around the exception. A voluntary reschedule is not: it performs > no return from exception, so the worker resumes with another task's > TTBR0_EL1 - or reserved_pg_dir - and the next efi_mm access takes a level 0 > translation fault. > > There is such a preemption point in arch_efi_call_virt_setup() itself, > immediately after the TTBR0 install: __efi_fpsimd_begin() -> > kernel_neon_begin() -> put_cpu_fpsimd_context() -> local_bh_enable() -> > preempt_check_resched(). Hmm, can we move the ttbr0 toggling until after __efi_fpsimd_begin() so that this preemption point doesn't interfere? Will