Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] efi: respect the poisoned pages coming from previous kernel
Kiryl Shutsemau <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-efi,org.infradead.lists.kexec,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aohldTtzE2GJ76md@thinkstation> |
On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 07:03:06AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 01:13:55PM +0100, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 03:06:06AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > > > + /* Reserve the table itself so it survives a further kexec. */ > > > + memblock_reserve(PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(ppm), > > > + PAGE_ALIGN(ppm + sizeof(*pm) + bitmap_size) - > > > + PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(ppm)); > > > > Hm. I don't think it is enough. > > > > On x86, kernel doesn't keep memblock around after boot (see > > CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK). Reserving in memblock exclude the memory > > from page allocator. But kexec can place the image there. > > You mean the third kexec? > > 1) Kernel A hits an ECC error and marks page X poisoned. > 2) Kernel A kexecs into kernel B, which won't use that page since > it's in EFI_POISONED_PAGE and memblock-reserved. > 3) Kernel B kexecs into kernel C, which doesn't respect > EFI_POISONED_PAGE. > > Is this the scenario you mean? No. I think nothing prevents kernel B from putting kernel C image into the reserved space in !CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK case. Kernel B excludes poisoned memory from buddy allocator, but kexec doesn't care about this when look for placement for the next image. -- Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov