Re: [PATCH 3/3] printk: implement support for extended console drivers
Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-embedded,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:47:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > netconsole itself is optional & modular. I'm not sure making further > > splits is called for, especially given the use cases. > > It could be a hidden option, selected by its users (e.g. netconsole). Hmmm... what do you mean? Thanks. -- tejun