RE: Deferred probe times
"Bird, Tim" <[email protected]> Sat, 24 May 2025 00:16:58 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-embedded |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <MW5PR13MB56324F6600F6844DB8A6FCD5FD9BA@MW5PR13MB5632.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Federico Giovanardi <[email protected]> > Hello, > > I was poking around the boot data database while I noticed that the > deferred_probe initicalls are considered as a giant block; Hmm. I didn't think anyone was looking at this data besides myself. The site is really still under construction, so I apologize for missing and mis-formatted data. But thanks for looking at the data and finding something that needs attention upstream!! > > There is a patch that looks never went upstream to measure them: > https://lkml.iu.edu/1707.3/02349.html Wow, that's interesting. Here's the lore link for this thread: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/#t It doesn't look like there were (after discussion) objections to accepting upstream. I wonder what happened. ... It looks like it was superceded by this patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ which may provide some of the data necessary. The thing missing there are some (IMHO) better name lookups for the probe function. I wrote a patch for that, but didn't persist in trying to upstream it. Maybe I should dust that off and send it again. > > And another one from me to print the result in the .svg. > > > Have a nice day > Federico