Re: [PATCH v3] printk: fix zero-valued printk timestamps in early boot

On Tue 2026-02-10 16:47:41, Tim Bird wrote:
> During early boot, printk timestamps are reported as zero before
> kernel timekeeping starts (e.g. before time_init()).  This
> hinders boot-time optimization efforts.  This period is about 400
> milliseconds for many current desktop and embedded machines
> running Linux.
> 
> Add support to save cycles during early boot, and output correct
> timestamp values after timekeeping is initialized.  get_cycles()
> is operational on arm64 and x86_64 from kernel start.  Add code
> and variables to save calibration values used to later convert
> cycle counts to time values in the early printks.  Add a config
> to control the feature.
> 
> This yields non-zero timestamps for printks from the very start
> of kernel execution.  The timestamps are relative to the start of
> the architecture-specified counter used in get_cycles
> (e.g. the TSC on x86_64 and cntvct_el0 on arm64).
> 
> All timestamps reflect time from processor power-on instead of
> time from the kernel's timekeeping initialization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tim Bird <[email protected]>

It looks good to me and seems to work fine. Feel free to use:

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>

See a note below.

> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@
>  #include <linux/pidfs.h>
>  #include <linux/ptdump.h>
>  #include <linux/time_namespace.h>
> +#include <linux/early_times.h>

JFYI, I have tried this patch on top of the current Linus' tree (v7.0-rc2+)
and it conflicted with the commit 499f86de4f8c34e19 ("init/main: read
bootconfig header with get_unaligned_le32()") which added here:

 #include <linux/unaligned.h>

>  #include <net/net_namespace.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/io.h>

Best Regards,
Petr