Re: [PATCH v4 14/14] video: leds: backlight: lm3533: Support getting LED sources from DT
Svyatoslav Ryhel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-fbdev,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-leds |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPVz0n0bpo6PAfdN+LGEgPYhEx8mqtu_SL=WnDxhWn-Cq4rQKA@mail.gmail.com> |
ср, 10 черв. 2026 р. о 21:54 Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> пише: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 05:45:28PM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > > вт, 9 черв. 2026 р. о 22:23 Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> пише: > > > On Sat, Jun 06, 2026 at 07:57:38AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > > > > Add Control Bank to HVLED/LVLED muxing support based on the led-sources > > > > defined in the device tree. > > ... > > > > > + int ret, i; > > > > > > No need to add 'i'. > > > > This is personal preference as well. There is no strict rule that > > iteration variable must be defined strictly in the for loop. > > This is a preference by Linus who is the leader of the project. > Also in IIO we have some set of maintainer preferences. > Well, this is not meant for IIO, though it seems that Lee is also in favor if this approach. > > > > + for (i = 0; i < led->num_leds; i++) { > > > > > > for (unsigned int i = 0; i < led->num_leds; i++) { > > > > > > > + if (led->leds[i] >= LM3533_LVCTRLBANK_MAX) > > > > + continue; > > > > + > > > > + output_cfg_shift = led->leds[i] * 2; > > > > + output_cfg_val |= led->id << output_cfg_shift; > > > > + output_cfg_mask |= OUTPUT_LVLED_MASK << output_cfg_shift; > > > > + } > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >