Re: [PATCH 0/2] ptp: split non-NIC PHC drivers into the clock/timekeeping maintenance domain
John Stultz <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Mar 2026 10:05:52 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-fpga,dev.linux.lists.imx,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANDhNCoFxsXdP7d6nbLTFLOrB_4GnDvhF4O6ZGyvGEVoqV4U2g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 12:33 AM Wen Gu <[email protected]> wrote: > - Following the model used by NTP related code, this series lists tip.git > (timers/core) as the integration tree for emulated PTP clocks in the > MAINTAINERS entry. Guidance from clock/timekeeping maintainers > (Thomas Gleixner, John Stultz, Anna-Maria Behnsen, Frederic Weisbecker, > Daniel Lezcano, Stephen Boyd) on whether this is the appropriate workflow > for this class of drivers would be appreciated. While I'm sure it would be good to continue to CC folks, I'm not sure if the timekeeping maintainers would be the right folks for these driver/ptp/ changes to flow through. Thomas has been doing the heavy lifting for a long while and I'd not want to put more on his shoulders. Richard is listed as the maintainer for drivers/ptp/, is there any reason for it not to go through him? thanks -john