Re: [PATCH v3] fpga: stratix10-soc: Fix SVC mailbox handling during reconfiguration

> @@ -195,20 +195,20 @@ static int s10_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
>  	ret = s10_svc_send_msg(priv, COMMAND_RECONFIG,
>  			       &ctype, sizeof(ctype));
>  	if (ret < 0)
> -		goto init_done;
> +		goto init_error;
>  
>  	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(
>  		&priv->status_return_completion, S10_RECONFIG_TIMEOUT);
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "timeout waiting for RECONFIG_REQUEST\n");
>  		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> -		goto init_done;
> +		goto init_error;
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = 0;

Why re-initialize ret here?

>  	if (!test_and_clear_bit(SVC_STATUS_OK, &priv->status)) {
>  		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> -		goto init_done;
> +		goto init_error;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Allocate buffers from the service layer's pool. */
> @@ -216,16 +216,19 @@ static int s10_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
>  		kbuf = stratix10_svc_allocate_memory(priv->chan, SVC_BUF_SIZE);
>  		if (IS_ERR(kbuf)) {
>  			s10_free_buffers(mgr);
> -			ret = PTR_ERR(kbuf);
> -			goto init_done;
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;

Why change the ret?

> +			goto init_error;
>  		}
>  
>  		priv->svc_bufs[i].buf = kbuf;
>  		priv->svc_bufs[i].lock = 0;
>  	}
>  
> -init_done:
> +	goto init_done;

Happy path? why not just return 0; And you don't need init_done at all.

> +
> +init_error:
>  	stratix10_svc_done(priv->chan);
> +init_done:
>  	return ret;
>  }