Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] block: validate direct I/O memory alignment

Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,dev.linux.lists.dm-devel,dev.linux.lists.regressions,org.kernel.vger.linux-block
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 7/30/26 6:52 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 01:26:26PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 02:03:07PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jens, have you had a chance to look at this one yet? This addresses
>>>>> previous issues with certain device mappers under direct io.
>>>>
>>>> I they look fine, but at this point we should toss them into 7.3. Yes
>>>> I know there are regressions around this, but from 6.1x days. And the
>>>> series doesn't apply to the current block-7.2 anyway.
>>>
>>> This series is kind of old at this point, but yes, it's not fixing a new
>>> regression either. I'm okay if this goes to the next window, and I will
>>> handle the stable follow-up.
>>
>> Honestly, I think that'a a reall bad idea.  This is a regression in 6.18,
>> and while it took a while for people to hit this with their a little
>> more complicated lvm/md setups, it has stopped real systems from being
>> used.  We need to fix this ASAP.
> 
> This should have gone in several weeks ago, IMO. You can most readily
> hit a problem running qemu against one of those lvm setups. We're just
> so late in this release cycle that I'm not pushing hard for 7.2, but I
> would support that choice too.

Exactly, it's been floating for a bit, and the last week is surely on
me. But merging at the time it was posted would've been late for fairly
substantial changes.

Hence why I think 7.3 is just the better choice. We're talking weeks in
difference on when it gets to stable anyway, which is what matters.

-- 
Jens Axboe
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.