Re: [PATCH 3/3] fs/namei.c: fix coding style in atomic_open() and lookup_open()
Jori Koolstra <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 11:20:04 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Op 31-07-2026 10:36 CEST schreef Christian Brauner <[email protected]>: > > > Commit 4886c80eef20 ("vfs: call audit_inode_child() in lookup_open() on > failure") indented a continuation line with spaces, left three > declarations without a following blank line and used a trailing */ on the > last line of a block comment. Clean all of that up, no functional change. > > Fixes: 4886c80eef20 ("vfs: call audit_inode_child() in lookup_open() on failure") > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <[email protected]> > I know checkpatch complains about this, but since namei.c has a bit of its own style, I didn't pay too much attention to that. Do we adhere strictly to checkpatch style in VFS? Anyhow, I'll add new lines after declarations in the future :) Thanks, Jori.