Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/huge_memory: use folio's memcg inside __folio_split()
"Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Aug 2026 10:36:03 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <am28pV2PEfHsi4p-@lucifer> |
On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 10:18:00PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote: > During a pagecache folio split, an xarray node allocation can happen and > needs to charge at folio's memcg instead of folio split invoker's memcg, > because for example folio split can happen during reclaim and reclaim's > active memcg might not be folio's memcg. Switch to folio's memcg at the > beginning and switch back afterwards. I assume this is the only allocation? I guess in general it makes sense to have the folio's memcg be active here regardless. > > Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> > Fixes: 6b24ca4a1a8d4 ("mm: Use multi-index entries in the page cache") Cc: stable? > Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <[email protected]> Change seems reasonable overall. Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <[email protected]> > --- > mm/huge_memory.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c > index 04e8a6b553435..b9c2d8908e564 100644 > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c > @@ -4063,34 +4063,42 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order, > XA_STATE(xas, &folio->mapping->i_pages, folio->index); > struct folio *end_folio = folio_next(folio); > bool is_anon = folio_test_anon(folio); > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg, *old_memcg; > struct address_space *mapping = NULL; > struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL; > int old_order = folio_order(folio); > struct folio *new_folio, *next; > int nr_shmem_dropped = 0; > enum ttu_flags ttu_flags = 0; > - int ret; > pgoff_t end = 0; > + int ret; > > VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio); > VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio), folio); > > if (folio != page_folio(split_at) || folio != page_folio(lock_at)) { > ret = -EINVAL; > - goto out; > + goto out_no_memcg; > } > > if (new_order >= old_order) { > ret = -EINVAL; > - goto out; > + goto out_no_memcg; > } > > ret = folio_check_splittable(folio, new_order, split_type); > if (ret) { > VM_WARN_ONCE(ret == -EINVAL, "Tried to split an unsplittable folio"); > - goto out; > + goto out_no_memcg; This function really badly needs splitting up and probably some cleanup.h work :) > } > > + /* > + * switch to folio's memcg as xarray node allocation can happen and > + * needs to charge to it. > + */ > + memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_folio(folio); > + old_memcg = set_active_memcg(memcg); > + > if (is_anon) { > /* > * The caller does not necessarily hold an mmap_lock that would > @@ -4231,6 +4239,10 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order, > if (mapping) > i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping); > out: > + /* restore to caller's old_memcg */ > + set_active_memcg(old_memcg); > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg); > +out_no_memcg: > xas_destroy(&xas); > if (is_pmd_order(old_order)) > count_vm_event(!ret ? THP_SPLIT_PAGE : THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED); > > -- > 2.53.0 > -- Cheers, Lorenzo