Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/4] selftest: Add tests for useful handling of LSM denials on SCM_RIGHTS

Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <CAAVpQUCW4B+9SHPE233TRdHHL0Xv7P0+mH91yEGeMret7vSONA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 3:18 AM Jori Koolstra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> > Op 04-08-2026 19:26 CEST schreef Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > +TEST_GEN_FILES := scm_rights_denial_lsm.bpf.o
> > > +
> > >  include ../../lib.mk
> > > +include ../bpf.mk
> > > +
> > > +$(OUTPUT)/scm_rights_denial_lsm: $(BPFOBJ)
> > > +$(OUTPUT)/scm_rights_denial_lsm: CFLAGS += -I$(SCRATCH_DIR)/include
> > > +$(OUTPUT)/scm_rights_denial_lsm: LDLIBS += -lelf -lz
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/config b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/config
> > > index 41dbb03c747e..468f7a0bb64e 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/config
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/config
> > > @@ -2,3 +2,10 @@ CONFIG_AF_UNIX_OOB=y
> > >  CONFIG_UNIX=y
> > >  CONFIG_UNIX_DIAG=m
> > >  CONFIG_USER_NS=y
> > > +CONFIG_BPF=y
> > > +CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y
> > > +CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS=y
> > > +CONFIG_BPF_JIT=y
> > > +CONFIG_SECURITY=y
> > > +CONFIG_BPF_LSM=y
> > > +CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y
> >
> > Please sort configs as CI complains.
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/[email protected]/
> >
> >
>
> Oh that is pretty neat!
>
> I wasn't aware there was a canonical sorting for the config. This should fix it,
>
> LC_ALL=C sort -c tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/config
>
> correct?

Yes, assuming you meant without -c.

>
> If I fix these issues today, any chance we can still get this in before the merge window
> starts again?

I think so.

From the Linus's email, it seems we still have next week for rc8.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whoz5Uy-kmrdzjrpCJCVWW3fni31c-zsHcH7TkOhRhfOA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.