Re: [PATCH 0/2] vfs: report truthful FIDEDUPERANGE progress safely

Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <20260812-gastgewerbe-dementieren-landzunge-db991673a96a@brauner>
On 2026-08-05 15:14 +0800, Matthias Goergens wrote:
> FIDEDUPERANGE currently reports the requested length even when the
> filesystem shortens a destination range and deduplicates fewer bytes. A
> previous one-line correction was reverted after generic/517 exposed the old
> expectation and reviewers raised the risk that existing consumers could loop
> on a successful zero-progress result.
> 
> Patch 1 makes a non-zero request shortened to zero fail per destination with
> -EINVAL, while preserving explicit zero-length success. Patch 2 then reports
> the filesystem's actual positive progress. This ordering keeps every
> intermediate kernel safe for callers that advance by bytes_deduped.
> 
> The paired fstests update corrects generic/517 and adds raw ioctl coverage for
> zero-length and mixed multi-destination results. Both tests pass on Btrfs and
> XFS. Installed duperemove exits successfully on the measured corpus. Installed
> rmlint does not hang or silently over-report; it exits 1 after the final
> unaligned tail receives -EINVAL, which is recorded explicitly for review.
> 
> A current-source consumer audit supports that ABI choice: duperemove completes
> the request on a non-zero status; rmlint, bees and jdupes surface -EINVAL as
> failure without retrying; dduper and xfs_io stop but can still report command
> success. None retries, hangs or risks data corruption. Thus -EINVAL is the
> only truthful result that also avoids exposing successful zero progress to
> deployed duperemove binaries.
> 
> Matthias Goergens (2):
>   vfs: fail dedupe requests that cannot make progress
>   vfs: report the amount of bytes actually deduplicated

Needs input from Amir.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.