Re: [PATCH] btrfs: use mount idmap for defrag permission check
Seth Forshee <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <an36yH30W965eqZk@ubuntu-x1> |
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 04:04:05PM +0930, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > > 在 2026/8/13 13:11, Tao Cui 写道: > > From: Tao Cui <[email protected]> > > > > btrfs_ioctl_defrag() checks MAY_WRITE with nop_mnt_idmap, which skips > > the mount idmap. On an idmapped mount the owner comparison then uses > > the caller's fsuid against the raw on-disk uid, dropping the mapping. > > Every other permission/owner check in btrfs ioctl uses > > file_mnt_idmap(file) (e.g. :1152, :1310, :1946); this one missed it. > > > > Switch to file_mnt_idmap(file). It equals nop_mnt_idmap on a normal > > mount, and the check stays behind !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN), so only > > unprivileged callers on idmapped btrfs change. The RO-fd note in the > > comment above is about the file descriptor, not this inode check, and > > is unaffected. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <[email protected]> > > Fixes: 4609e1f18e19 ("fs: port ->permission() to pass mnt_idmap") This is a misattribution. Using nop_mnt_idmap there keeps the behavior the same as it was before the commit. Switching to the mount idmap opens up BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG* to idmapped users when they weren't before, which is a separate policy decision that didn't belong in that change. Saying that these ioctls should be allowed for idmapped users just because others are isn't a good justification. Why are these ioctls safe for idmapped users? Do they actually require this capability? Thanks, Seth