Re: [PATCH v3] fsnotify: Fix stale object mask after concurrent mark updates

Amir Goldstein <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.stable
Message-ID <CAOQ4uxhuFVKmBP0gq1o302p=eLk+wyuDsjJJ-w14gKQcVcX4_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 11:54 AM Jan Kara <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun 02-08-26 10:58:00, Youngjae Kwon wrote:
> > When a mark gets a new event bit, fanotify and inotify may avoid
> > recalculating the object mask if the cached aggregate already contains that
> > bit. This is racy with a recalculation triggered by a concurrent update to
> > another mark on the same connector.
> >
> > The concurrent scan can read the mark before the new bit is added, while
> > the updater reads the old aggregate before that scan publishes its result.
> > The updater then skips recalculation and the scan publishes a mask without
> > the bit, leaving the object mask stale after both updates complete.
> >
> > This can be reproduced with two fanotify groups watching the same inode:
> > one thread removes FAN_MODIFY from one existing mark while another thread
> > adds FAN_MODIFY to the other mark. After both fanotify_mark() calls return,
> > writes can fail to produce FAN_MODIFY for the group whose mark now contains
> > the bit. This was reproduced on an unmodified v6.12.95 kernel. The
> > equivalent inotify interleaving loses IN_MODIFY events.
> >
> > For normal fanotify additions, recalculate whenever the raw mark mask
> > changes. The normal mask is not cleared asynchronously, so an unchanged
> > addition cannot introduce missing interest. Always recalculate ignore-mask
> > updates because FS_MODIFY handling may clear the ignore mask without taking
> > mark->lock, making snapshot comparisons unreliable.
> >
> > Always recalculate after updating an existing inotify watch. Its replace
> > path temporarily sets mark->mask to zero, so a concurrent scan can observe
> > zero even when the old and final masks are equal. Assigning the replacement
> > mask directly would avoid the transient zero, but existing-watch updates
> > are infrequent, so unconditional recalculation is simpler.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CACwKKmCZdiZDoFuYm6LZhQ=XvHPk0fNKH=X3LmoXMqakYqJaNw@mail.gmail.com/
> > Fixes: 63c882a05416 ("inotify: reimplement inotify using fsnotify")
> > Fixes: 912ee3946c5e ("fanotify: do not call fanotify_update_object_mask in fanotify_add_mark")
> > Cc: [email protected] # needs adjustments for <= 7.0
> > Suggested-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> > Suggested-by: Amir Goldstein <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Youngjae Kwon <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks the patch looks good to me, I've added it to my tree. Amir, are you
> happy with the changes like this?

Sorry for the late reply.
Was on vacation.
Yes, this seems fine to me.

Thanks,
Amir.


>
>                                                                 Honza
>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Preserve the normal fanotify duplicate-add fast path by recalculating
> >   only when the raw normal mask actually changes.
> > - Recalculate fanotify ignore-mask updates unconditionally because the
> >   ignore mask may be cleared concurrently without mark->lock.
> > - Keep v2's unconditional recalculation for existing inotify watch updates.
> >
> > I will send backports for stable kernels through 7.0.y after this lands.
> >
> >  fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 12 +++++++-----
> >  fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c   | 15 +--------------
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> > index 9ee373ff5..9c27db2b7 100644
> > --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> > +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> > @@ -1321,16 +1321,18 @@ static bool fanotify_mark_update_flags(struct fsnotify_mark *fsn_mark,
> >  static bool fanotify_mark_add_to_mask(struct fsnotify_mark *fsn_mark,
> >                                     __u32 mask, unsigned int fan_flags)
> >  {
> > +     __u32 old_mask;
> >       bool recalc;
> >
> >       spin_lock(&fsn_mark->lock);
> > -     if (!(fan_flags & FANOTIFY_MARK_IGNORE_BITS))
> > +     if (!(fan_flags & FANOTIFY_MARK_IGNORE_BITS)) {
> > +             old_mask = fsn_mark->mask;
> >               fsn_mark->mask |= mask;
> > -     else
> > +             recalc = old_mask != fsn_mark->mask;
> > +     } else {
> >               fsn_mark->ignore_mask |= mask;
> > -
> > -     recalc = fsnotify_calc_mask(fsn_mark) &
> > -             ~fsnotify_conn_mask(fsn_mark->connector);
> > +             recalc = true;
> > +     }
> >
> >       recalc |= fanotify_mark_update_flags(fsn_mark, fan_flags);
> >       spin_unlock(&fsn_mark->lock);
> > diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
> > index ed37491c1..5f19c24ec 100644
> > --- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
> > +++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
> > @@ -539,7 +539,6 @@ static int inotify_update_existing_watch(struct fsnotify_group *group,
> >  {
> >       struct fsnotify_mark *fsn_mark;
> >       struct inotify_inode_mark *i_mark;
> > -     __u32 old_mask, new_mask;
> >       int replace = !(arg & IN_MASK_ADD);
> >       int create = (arg & IN_MASK_CREATE);
> >       int ret;
> > @@ -555,27 +554,15 @@ static int inotify_update_existing_watch(struct fsnotify_group *group,
> >       i_mark = container_of(fsn_mark, struct inotify_inode_mark, fsn_mark);
> >
> >       spin_lock(&fsn_mark->lock);
> > -     old_mask = fsn_mark->mask;
> >       if (replace) {
> >               fsn_mark->mask = 0;
> >               fsn_mark->flags &= ~INOTIFY_MARK_FLAGS;
> >       }
> >       fsn_mark->mask |= inotify_arg_to_mask(inode, arg);
> >       fsn_mark->flags |= inotify_arg_to_flags(arg);
> > -     new_mask = fsn_mark->mask;
> >       spin_unlock(&fsn_mark->lock);
> >
> > -     if (old_mask != new_mask) {
> > -             /* more bits in old than in new? */
> > -             int dropped = (old_mask & ~new_mask);
> > -             /* more bits in this fsn_mark than the inode's mask? */
> > -             int do_inode = (new_mask & ~READ_ONCE(inode->i_fsnotify_mask));
> > -
> > -             /* update the inode with this new fsn_mark */
> > -             if (dropped || do_inode)
> > -                     fsnotify_recalc_mask(fsn_mark->connector);
> > -
> > -     }
> > +     fsnotify_recalc_mask(fsn_mark->connector);
> >
> >       /* return the wd */
> >       ret = i_mark->wd;
> > --
> > 2.50.1
> --
> Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> SUSE Labs, CR
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.