Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/5] mm: Add copy_remote_mm_str()
Anastasios Papagiannis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> AI has a point, declarations in mm.h are not guarded by #ifdef > CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL, no? These look generic, I'd remove BPF_SYSCALL > guard Yes, this sounds reasonable. I have removed the #ifdefs in v8 [1]. CC David, who proposed removing the #ifdefs from the header file in [2], and Lorenzo, who has already acked the patch. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/