Re: Why __memrchr vs. memrchr ?

"Dmitry V. Levin" <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Feb 2004 01:17:23 +0300
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-gcc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 02:37:21AM +0500, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> Why such a scheme is used in GLIBC:
> 
> declare + define __memrchr, and than
> 
> # ifdef __USE_GNU
> #  define memrchr(s, c, n) __memrchr ((s), (c), (n))
> # endif
> 
> ?  memrchr is not the GNU extension, is it?

According to memchr(3),
"The memrchr() function is a GNU extension, available since glibc 2.1.91".


-- 
ldv
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAHsxz9viEa8HiNCkRAkaMAJ9ZyxXWrgpVpMXu4qA192ae5nk2vQCeKQWY
e3snuwkVEpnWrtSIhz3XidY=
=pFuo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----