Re: Why __memrchr vs. memrchr ?
"Dmitry V. Levin" <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Feb 2004 01:17:23 +0300
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-gcc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 02:37:21AM +0500, Denis Zaitsev wrote: > Why such a scheme is used in GLIBC: > > declare + define __memrchr, and than > > # ifdef __USE_GNU > # define memrchr(s, c, n) __memrchr ((s), (c), (n)) > # endif > > ? memrchr is not the GNU extension, is it? According to memchr(3), "The memrchr() function is a GNU extension, available since glibc 2.1.91". -- ldv
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAHsxz9viEa8HiNCkRAkaMAJ9ZyxXWrgpVpMXu4qA192ae5nk2vQCeKQWY e3snuwkVEpnWrtSIhz3XidY= =pFuo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----