Re: Why __memrchr vs. memrchr ?

Andreas Jaeger <[email protected]> Tue, 03 Feb 2004 07:03:40 +0100

Newsgroups	org.kernel.vger.linux-gcc
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 01:17:23AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 02:37:21AM +0500, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
>> > Why such a scheme is used in GLIBC:
>> > 
>> > declare + define __memrchr, and than
>> > 
>> > # ifdef __USE_GNU
>> > #  define memrchr(s, c, n) __memrchr ((s), (c), (n))
>> > # endif
>> > 
>> > ?  memrchr is not the GNU extension, is it?
>> 
>> According to memchr(3),
>> "The memrchr() function is a GNU extension, available since glibc 2.1.91".
>
> Oh, I'm sorry.  This fact is omited from the texinfo GLIBC
> documentation...

It's in the Library Summary:
`void * memrchr (const void *BLOCK, int C, size_t SIZE)'
     `string.h' (GNU):  *Note Search Functions::.


Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, [email protected], http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 188 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAHzm8OJpWPMJyoSYRAkklAJ4+CXEYF80TEKHuSP8uRD6cH+w88wCcCgxD
u8XEYDmq8cWEJUqENSUrq4E=
=WJwl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----