Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?

On Jan 5, 2005, at 5:09 PM, Denis Zaitsev wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:21:23PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 5, 2005, at 12:14 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
>>
>>> I also find it strange (broken) that a c++ app that doesn't use any
>>> libm
>>> symbols is linked to it anyway. Why does it matter?
>>
>> because libstdc++ might pull in libm symbols without the person 
>> knowing
>> he did.
>
> Ok.  But the question in general is not about that.  It is not a
> problem that libm is NEEDED by libstdc++, but why this NEEDED leads to
> the same NEEDED for the app?  Isn't the first depndency enough?

No, because some of libstdc++ code is in the headers, on some targets
have two level namespaces which causes this to be rejected.

-- Pinski