Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?

Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:30:03 +0500

Newsgroups	org.kernel.vger.linux-gcc
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:16:20PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> 
> On Jan 5, 2005, at 5:09 PM, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> 
> > Ok.  But the question in general is not about that.  It is not a
> > problem that libm is NEEDED by libstdc++, but why this NEEDED leads to
> > the same NEEDED for the app?  Isn't the first depndency enough?
> 
> No, because some of libstdc++ code is in the headers, on some targets
> have two level namespaces which causes this to be rejected.

Sorry, what to be rejected?