Re: Alternative compilers to GCC/Clang

Pavel Machek <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:53:28 +0100
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-gcc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kbuild,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi!

> > Hello! My name's Amy. I'm really impressed by the work done to make
> > Clang (and the LLVM toolchain overall) able to compile the kernel.
> > Figured I might as well donate my monkey hours to helping make it run
> > on other compilers as well. I haven't been able to find any that use
> > the same arguments structure as GCC and Clang (read: you can pass it
> > in as CC=3Dcompilername in your $MAKEOPTS). Any compilers along that
> > route anyone here has worked with that I could work with?
>=20
> If you're interested, you should have a look at TCC (tiny CC) :
>=20
>      https://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git
>=20
> It compiles extremely fast, implements some subsets of gcc (a few
> attributes for example), but is far from being able to compile a kernel
> (at least last time I checked). Its speed makes it very convenient for
> development. I made some efforts to make haproxy support it (and provided
> some fixes to tcc) as it compiles the whole project in 0.5 second instead
> of ~10 seconds with a modern gcc. It could probably compile a kernel in
> 15-20 seconds if properly supported, and this could be particularly handy
> for development and testing.

For the record, yes, something that compiles kernel fast would be very
very nice.

Best regards,
								Pavel

--=20
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCYEiJCAAKCRAw5/Bqldv6
8p11AKCDwTTMrx+W0hdAZUHUMPePkUqsMwCfecQRePV2o724Cd/lGV4I13rQfKA=
=wTkl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--