Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Subject: [PATCH v6 0/7] ASoC: qcom and pinctrl: add LPASS LPR voting and Hawi LPASS LPI support
Mark Brown <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 01:22:08 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-gpio,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-sound |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 07:32:55AM -0700, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:17:03 +0200, Prasad Kumpatla > > The intended merge strategy is: > > 1. Merge the dt-bindings patch adding LPASS_HW_LPR_VOTE to > > qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h. > > 2. After the header update is merged, the remaining ASoC and > > pinctrl patches may be merged through their respective > > subsystem trees. > Do you really want to wait an entire additional cycle for a one-liner to first > get upstream? I mean: I don't mind it but it's a weird strategy. I presume the thought is to put it on a shared branch, but that gets problematic if I create that branch because the ASoC driver has dependencies on whatever is in the huge pile of stuff that's already going through ASoC so it'd pull in my entire history. I suppose I could do the tag, merge it into my branch then apply the ASoC driver? I've complained previously about how unmanagable all these interdependent qcom things are, now this adds cross tree issues!
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmpqmS8ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9B7MQgAgm6hK4vAkMntaBcwPRR8rsOum/KanN05OaB96ft/sKZNLYZHimpODf7I lKl4jwUXl7ZE/eF2d8UN1QrEbIx/kLtUYSz48uL7fEFH9bMPSIYkKYu5mKGQvn9p 2YLWuJnLhEexcQh8sKkVHxCwFNRnttLeXRvaZHrDcg8sHP+h4C3svYFJJq/OojjV ypZlcV10+0uSsu5g/+ECOqNoj0l3HYlPIPxGvKGCAac60wN8mIoXWbs3J9SuFaAK KMvniNeKaxFjyCbK8eE9OX09wpndayTwpCA0WFMtfEOC+53zWOwuLIvAwHTqipAU DBQXIApzYuD49t4nv/h3M8kiAsqDWQ== =5Jb6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----