Re: [PATCH 06/15] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add Qualcomm Kuno NoC

Hardeep Sharma <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-gpio,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/11/2026 6:29 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2026 at 12:57:05PM +0530, Hardeep Sharma wrote:
>> Add the Devicetree bindings and node-ID definitions for the RPMh-based
>> Network-on-Chip interconnect providers on the Qualcomm Kuno SoC,
>> enabling DT validation and interconnect bandwidth voting.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hardeep Sharma <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,kuno-rpmh.yaml      | 72 +++++++++++++++++
>>   include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,kuno.h       | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 161 insertions(+)
> Are there no clocks requires for QoS?

I've addressed the binding-side follow-up in this v2:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/


qcom,kuno-rpmh.yaml now permits up to 4 QoS AHB clocks
(clocks/clock-names: minItems: 1, maxItems: 4) matching sdx75/glymur,
so consumers can wire them if they choose. The Kuno DTS itself lands
with no clocks= on the interconnect nodes since RPMh BCM covers the
paths — same shape as sdx75.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.