Re: [patch 09/38] iommu/vt-d: Use sched_clock() instead of get_cycles()
Baolu Lu <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Apr 2026 21:45:43 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-hams,dev.linux.lists.iommu,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.linux-alpha,org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-fbdev,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-m68k,org.kernel.vger.linux-openrisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-parisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.sparclinux,org.kvack.linux-mm,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/10/2026 8:19 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Calculating the timeout from get_cycles() is a historical leftover without > any functional requirement. > > Use ktime_get() instead. The subject line says "Use sched_clock() ...", but the implementation actually uses ktime_get(). Is it a typo or anything I misunderstood? Other parts look good to me, Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner<[email protected]> > Cc:[email protected] > Cc: Lu Baolu<[email protected]> > Cc:[email protected] > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/iommu.h | 3 --- > drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 8 ++++++-- > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Thanks, baolu