Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfs: Add KUnit tests for fdtable
Jann Horn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-hardening,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG48ez1VBBkukXH17RRSnAU7rMu0St5x59rkTDVkcMebxuS4-g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 2:16 AM Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 08:41:13PM +0000, Bill Wendling wrote: > > +static void fdtable_test_alloc(struct kunit *test) > > +{ > > + struct fdtable *fdt; > > + unsigned int slots = 64; > > + > > + fdt = alloc_fdtable(slots); > > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, fdt); > > + > > + /* Check that max_fds is set correctly and is >= slots */ > > + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, fdt->max_fds, slots); > > + > > + /* Check that fd is allocated */ > > + KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, fdt->fd); > > Nice to add these tests! Can you add one for each of the conditionals > in alloc_fdtable (e.g. ENOMEM, EMFILE, and the power-of-two rounding-up > logic, etc)? Wouldn't tests for stuff like the rounding-up logic get into implementation details too much, and break if implementation choices change?