Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] hwmon: (pmbus/vt7505) Add driver for Analog Devices MAX16545/MAX16550 and Volterra VT7505

Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-hwmon,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On 7/24/26 09:50, Pradhan, Sanman wrote:
> From: Georgi Vlaev <[email protected]>
> 
> Add a PMBus driver for the Analog Devices MAX16545 and MAX16550, and the
> Volterra VT7505 controllers. The driver reports input/output voltage,
> input/output current, input power and temperature over PMBus. All values
> use the direct data format. Peak input voltage, output voltage, output
> current, input power and temperature readings are exposed and can be
> reset.
> 
> The reported current and power depend on the external current-report
> resistor connected to the ILOAD pin, which can be provided through the
> "adi,rload-ohms" device tree property.
> 
> On the MAX16550 and VT7505, the severe-OCP deglitch time can optionally
> be configured with the "adi,ocp-severe-filter-us" device tree property.
> When omitted, the existing hardware setting is left unchanged.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Georgi Vlaev <[email protected]>
> Co-developed-by: Dhruva Devineni <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Dhruva Devineni <[email protected]>
> Co-developed-by: Debjit Ghosh <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Debjit Ghosh <[email protected]>
> Co-developed-by: JawaharBalaji Thirumalaisamy <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: JawaharBalaji Thirumalaisamy <[email protected]>
> Co-developed-by: Avadhut Naik <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Avadhut Naik <[email protected]>
> Co-developed-by: Santhanakrishnan Balraj <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Santhanakrishnan Balraj <[email protected]>
> Co-developed-by: Brian Mak <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Mak <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Sanman Pradhan <[email protected]>
> ---

I get delivery errors for the following addresses.
     [email protected]
     [email protected]
     [email protected]

meaning they are quite obviously _not_ involved in the patch approval path.
Please drop those addresses. Also, per Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:

  Any further SoBs (Signed-off-by:'s) following the author's SoB are from
  people handling and transporting the patch, but were not involved in its
  development. SoB chains should reflect the **real** route a patch took
  as it was propagated to the maintainers and ultimately to Linus, with
  the first SoB entry signalling primary authorship of a single author.

Does the above SoB sequence really reflect the approval patch for this
patch ?

Thanks,
Guenter
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.