Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon: (corsair-psu) Fix linear11 calculation
Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-hwmon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/6/26 08:34, Wilken Gottwalt wrote: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 20:48:11 -0700 > Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In corsairpsu_linear11_to_int(), the mantissa is extracted using bitwise >> operations and cast to s16 before being shifted left: >> >> static int corsairpsu_linear11_to_int(const u16 val, const int scale) >> { >> ... >> const int mant = (((s16)(val & 0x7ff)) << 5) >> 5; >> ... >> } >> >> Due to C integer promotion rules, the masked value (which is always >> positive) is promoted to a 32-bit integer before the left shift. As a >> result, the sign bit is never extended to bit 31 of the promoted integer. >> >> When the device hardware reports a negative temperature in Linear11 format >> (such as an ambient temperature probe reporting sub-zero), the negative >> mantissa is parsed incorrectly as a massive positive value. For example, >> -1 becomes 2047, which scales to 2047 degrees Celsius. >> >> Fix the problem by type casting the result of the left shift operation >> to s16. >> >> Another problem is left-shifting of negative values. In C, the result of >> left-shifting negative values is undefined. Use a multiplication instead >> to avoid the problem. >> >> Also use a local s64 variable to store temporary results, change >> the return value type from int to long, and clamp the final value >> to LONG_MIN and LONG_MAX to avoid under- and overflow issues while >> retaining as much information as possible. >> >> Reported-by: Sashiko <[email protected]> >> Cc: Wilken Gottwalt <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> >> --- >> v2: Skip handling right-shift of negative values >> (since it is widely used in the kernel) >> >> drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c >> index 24100519cd83..c437b469de5c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c >> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c >> @@ -137,13 +137,18 @@ struct corsairpsu_data { >> }; >> >> /* some values are SMBus LINEAR11 data which need a conversion */ >> -static int corsairpsu_linear11_to_int(const u16 val, const int scale) >> +static long corsairpsu_linear11_to_long(const u16 val, const int scale) >> { >> const int exp = ((s16)val) >> 11; >> - const int mant = (((s16)(val & 0x7ff)) << 5) >> 5; >> - const int result = mant * scale; >> + const int mant = ((s16)((val & 0x7ff) << 5)) >> 5; > > >> + s64 result = mant * scale; > > Uhm, this is a 32bit multiplicaiton, actully a C gotcha I explain the beginners > in our company. https://godbolt.org/z/eM6TbGG5E > It is, but that is ok and intentional: both mant and exp are guaranteed to be no larger than s16, meaning the result is never larger than s32 and will never overflow. >> - return (exp >= 0) ? (result << exp) : (result >> -exp); >> + if (exp >= 0) >> + result *= (int)(1UL << exp); This is the calculation that can overflow, making it necessary for result to be s64. Thanks, Guenter