Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: mana: Add handler for sriov configure

[email protected]
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-hyperv
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Disabling SR-IOV without checking if Virtual Functions (VFs) are assigned to a guest VM.
- [High] Missing SR-IOV cleanup during PF driver removal and shutdown.
--

commit 3df823cc57367f69930deb6dc48172ce7d77e785
Author: Haiyang Zhang <[email protected]>

net: mana: Add handler for sriov configure

Add callback function for the pci_driver / sriov_configure.

It asks the NIC to provide certain number of VFs, or disable
VFs if the request is zero.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
> index e8b7ffb47eb98..f7a79874fd0eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
> @@ -2496,6 +2496,20 @@ static void mana_gd_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	pci_disable_device(pdev);
>  }

[Severity: High]
With the addition of SR-IOV support in this patch, do mana_gd_shutdown() and
mana_gd_remove() need to call pci_disable_sriov()?

If a user enables VFs via sysfs and then unbinds the driver or shuts down the
system, could this omission introduce a regression where orphaned, dead VF PCI
devices are left in the kernel?

Accessing these orphaned VFs might trigger use-after-free crashes or hardware
faults, as the underlying PF hardware and driver context have been destroyed.

> +static int mana_sriov_configure(struct pci_dev *pdev, int numvfs)
> +{
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Requested num VFs: %d\n", numvfs);
> +
> +	if (numvfs > 0)
> +		err = pci_enable_sriov(pdev, numvfs);
> +	else
> +		pci_disable_sriov(pdev);

[Severity: High]
Should this path check if the VFs are currently assigned to a guest VM before
disabling SR-IOV?

If a privileged user writes 0 to sriov_numvfs while VFs are actively assigned
to a VM (e.g., via vfio-pci), could forcefully removing the PCI devices cause
a regression resulting in host IOMMU faults and guest kernel panics?

Would it be better to check pci_vfs_assigned(pdev) here, or use the
pci_sriov_configure_simple() helper to safely enforce this?

> +
> +	return err ? err : numvfs;
> +}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.