Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] i2c: core: Add i2c_update_timeout() helper for dynamic transfer timeouts

--LtUAlmVp+O5c2oKO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline


> Given the feedback so far, would maintainers prefer that if i drop the core
> helper entirely and keep the dynamic timeout calculation local to the
> qcom-geni driver or should we continue exploring an opt-in core-based
> approach?

Well, I suggested a potential way in my last mail (Kconfig option). So,
what do you think about it? Does it handle your use case?


--LtUAlmVp+O5c2oKO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=BDhl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LtUAlmVp+O5c2oKO--