Re: [PATCH v8 4/8] mfd: khadas-mcu: Add support for VIM4 MCU variant
[email protected] Tue, 4 Aug 2026 10:54:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-i2c,org.infradead.lists.linux-amlogic,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/23/26 5:48 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > /* Sashiko Automation: Reviewed (0 Findings) */ > > On Thu, 02 Jul 2026, Ronald Claveau via B4 Relay wrote: > >> From: Ronald Claveau <[email protected]> >> >> Refactor probe() to use per-variant values >> instead of hardcoded globals. >> >> Add dedicated regmap configuration for the VIM4 MCU, >> with its own volatile/writeable registers. >> >> Add the fan control register >> (0–100 levels vs 0–3 for previous supported boards). >> >> Add a new compatible string "khadas,vim4-mcu". >> >> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Ronald Claveau <[email protected]> >> --- >> >> drivers/mfd/khadas-mcu.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/khadas-mcu.c b/drivers/mfd/khadas-mcu.c >> index ba981a7886921..d2ca7deda45c6 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mfd/khadas-mcu.c >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/khadas-mcu.c >> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ >> #include <linux/module.h> >> #include <linux/regmap.h> >> >> #define KHADAS_MCU_FAN_LEVEL_MAX 3 >> #define KHADAS_MCU_VIM4_FAN_LEVEL_MAX 0x64 >> + >> static bool khadas_mcu_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg) >> { >> if (reg >= KHADAS_MCU_USER_DATA_0_REG && >> @@ -75,47 +78,129 @@ static const struct regmap_config khadas_mcu_regmap_config = { >> .cache_type = REGCACHE_MAPLE, >> }; >> >> -static struct mfd_cell khadas_mcu_fan_cells[] = { >> +static const struct khadas_mcu_fan_pdata khadas_mcu_fan_pdata = { >> + .fan_reg = KHADAS_MCU_CMD_FAN_STATUS_CTRL_REG, >> + .max_level = KHADAS_MCU_FAN_LEVEL_MAX, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct mfd_cell khadas_mcu_fan_cells[] = { >> /* VIM1/2 Rev13+ and VIM3 only */ >> - { .name = "khadas-mcu-fan-ctrl", }, >> + { >> + .name = "khadas-mcu-fan-ctrl", >> + .platform_data = &khadas_mcu_fan_pdata, >> + .pdata_size = sizeof(khadas_mcu_fan_pdata), >> + }, >> }; > > If you're tweaking, feel free to get more upstream creds by laying down > a prelim patch changing these to MFD_CELL_*(). > Thanks for the suggestion, will do that for the next version. >> -static struct mfd_cell khadas_mcu_cells[] = { >> +static const struct mfd_cell khadas_mcu_cells[] = { >> { .name = "khadas-mcu-user-mem", }, >> }; >> >> +static bool khadas_mcu_vim4_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg) >> +{ >> + switch (reg) { >> + case KHADAS_MCU_PWR_OFF_CMD_REG: >> + case KHADAS_MCU_VIM4_REST_CONF_REG: >> + case KHADAS_MCU_WOL_INIT_START_REG: >> + case KHADAS_MCU_VIM4_LED_ON_RAM_REG: >> + case KHADAS_MCU_VIM4_FAN_CTRL_REG: >> + case KHADAS_MCU_VIM4_WDT_EN_REG: >> + case KHADAS_MCU_VIM4_SYS_RST_REG: >> + return true; >> + default: >> + return false; >> + } >> +} >> + >> +static bool khadas_mcu_vim4_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg) >> +{ >> + switch (reg) { >> + case KHADAS_MCU_VERSION_0_REG: >> + case KHADAS_MCU_VERSION_1_REG: >> + case KHADAS_MCU_SHUTDOWN_NORMAL_STATUS_REG: >> + return false; >> + default: >> + return true; >> + } >> +} >> + >> +static const struct regmap_config khadas_mcu_vim4_regmap_config = { >> + .reg_bits = 8, >> + .reg_stride = 1, >> + .val_bits = 8, >> + .max_register = KHADAS_MCU_VIM4_SYS_RST_REG, >> + .volatile_reg = khadas_mcu_vim4_reg_volatile, >> + .writeable_reg = khadas_mcu_vim4_reg_writeable, >> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_MAPLE, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct khadas_mcu_fan_pdata khadas_vim4_fan_pdata = { >> + .fan_reg = KHADAS_MCU_VIM4_FAN_CTRL_REG, >> + .max_level = KHADAS_MCU_VIM4_FAN_LEVEL_MAX, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct mfd_cell khadas_mcu_vim4_cells[] = { >> + { >> + .name = "khadas-mcu-fan-ctrl", >> + .platform_data = &khadas_vim4_fan_pdata, >> + .pdata_size = sizeof(khadas_vim4_fan_pdata), >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> static int khadas_mcu_probe(struct i2c_client *client) >> { >> + const struct mfd_cell *cells, *fan_cells; >> + const struct regmap_config *regmap_cfg; >> struct device *dev = &client->dev; >> + int ncells, nfan_cells, ret; >> struct khadas_mcu *ddata; >> - int ret; >> >> ddata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ddata), GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!ddata) >> return -ENOMEM; >> >> + switch ((uintptr_t)i2c_get_match_data(client)) { > > Let's pull this out of the switch(): > > const void *match; > > match = i2c_get_match_data(client); > if (!match) > return -ENODEV; > > This would separate the declaration from the potentially failing > function call and prevent implicitly matching 'KHADAS_MCU_GENERIC' (if > its value is 0) should the lookup fail. > Thanks for that catch, I will change it. >> + case KHADAS_MCU_GENERIC: >> + regmap_cfg = &khadas_mcu_regmap_config; >> + cells = khadas_mcu_cells; >> + ncells = ARRAY_SIZE(khadas_mcu_cells); >> + fan_cells = khadas_mcu_fan_cells; >> + nfan_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(khadas_mcu_fan_cells); >> + break; >> + case KHADAS_MCU_VIM4: >> + regmap_cfg = &khadas_mcu_vim4_regmap_config; >> + cells = NULL; >> + ncells = 0; >> + fan_cells = khadas_mcu_vim4_cells; >> + nfan_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(khadas_mcu_vim4_cells); >> + break; >> + default: >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> i2c_set_clientdata(client, ddata); >> >> ddata->dev = dev; >> >> - ddata->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &khadas_mcu_regmap_config); >> + ddata->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, regmap_cfg); >> if (IS_ERR(ddata->regmap)) { >> ret = PTR_ERR(ddata->regmap); >> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret); >> - return ret; >> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to allocate register map\n"); >> } >> >> - ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, >> - khadas_mcu_cells, >> - ARRAY_SIZE(khadas_mcu_cells), >> - NULL, 0, NULL); >> - if (ret) >> - return ret; >> + if (cells && ncells) { >> + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, >> + cells, >> + ncells, >> + NULL, 0, NULL); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + } >> >> if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "#cooling-cells")) >> return devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, >> - khadas_mcu_fan_cells, >> - ARRAY_SIZE(khadas_mcu_fan_cells), >> + fan_cells, >> + nfan_cells, >> NULL, 0, NULL); >> >> return 0; >> @@ -123,7 +208,8 @@ static int khadas_mcu_probe(struct i2c_client *client) >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_OF >> static const struct of_device_id khadas_mcu_of_match[] = { >> - { .compatible = "khadas,mcu", }, >> + { .compatible = "khadas,mcu", .data = (void *)KHADAS_MCU_GENERIC }, >> + { .compatible = "khadas,vim4-mcu", .data = (void *)KHADAS_MCU_VIM4 }, >> {}, >> }; >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, khadas_mcu_of_match); >> >> -- >> 2.49.0 >> >> > -- Best regards, Ronald