Re: [PATCH 1/7] pmdomain: arm: Fix -EINVAL from scmi_pd_set_perf_state() on state 0
Mukesh Savaliya <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Aug 2026 14:43:02 +0530
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-i2c,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.arm-scmi,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm,org.kernel.vger.linux-serial,org.kernel.vger.linux-spi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/12/2026 2:27 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 9:24 AM Mukesh Savaliya [...] >>> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_perf_domain.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_perf_domain.c >>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ scmi_pd_set_perf_state(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, unsigned int state) >>> return 0; >>> >>> if (!state) >>> - return -EINVAL; >>> + return 0; >> >> Won't this cause an issue to other drivers ? how are they going to take >> action based on changed return value ? > > I think it's rather the opposite. With the current returned value > (-EINVAL) the driver doesn't really know what to do. It tried to drop > its vote, but that failed - so what can it do? > > Moreover, from genpd point of view, this fixes a real bug as the > aggregation for the performance state becomes incorrect during runtime > suspend/resume. > Got it, thanks Ulf for your explanation and also read your previous comments. >> >> Remove Acked-by due to this till i give back. Reviewed-by: Mukesh Savaliya <[email protected]>