RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: designware: Enable SAR in slave mode for Multiple SAR controllers

Hi Andy , 

Apologies for the oversight — no functional changes were made since your Reviewed-by. 
I inadvertently dropped the tag during commit amend. Resending as v6 with your Reviewed-by included.

Regards ,
Umesh Kumar

From: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2026 10:04 PM
To: Umesh Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Shyti <[email protected]>; Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>; Bharat Bhushan <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: designware: Enable SAR in slave mode for Multiple SAR controllers

On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 09: 51: 41PM +0530, Umesh Kumar wrote: > DesignWare controllers synthesised with the Multiple SAR feature (e. g. > Marvell CN20K) gate the primary slave address behind IC_ENABLE. SAR_EN > (bit 19). Per the Synopsys
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
Prioritize security for external emails: 
Confirm sender and content safety before clicking links or opening attachments 
  https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/CRVmXkqW!tO3TvhD0whzUOE920RVUQ_XJPV3L26S-lEMnq92RJA9M7hx481kZx8jKjFzdQ9FYO_HrR3ywL34PqSFqWA$  ‌ 


ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 09:51:41PM +0530, Umesh Kumar wrote:
> DesignWare controllers synthesised with the Multiple SAR feature (e.g.
> Marvell CN20K) gate the primary slave address behind IC_ENABLE.SAR_EN
> (bit 19). Per the Synopsys DW_apb_i2c DataBook v2.03a (Multiple SAR
> feature), when this bit is set the core acknowledges the address matching
> IC_SAR; otherwise the address is NACKed. The slave enable path writes only
> IC_ENABLE.ENABLE (bit 0), so on such controllers the target never ACKs
> its address and a remote master cannot reach it.
> 
> Set SAR_EN together with ENABLE when entering slave mode. The bit is
> reserved (and ignored) on single-SAR controllers, so existing users are
> unaffected.

I gave my tag and it is absent here. What's going on?
Do you think the fix is not only that and requires a new round of review?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko