Re: [PATCH] i2c: mv64xxx: fix autosuspend cleanup

Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-i2c,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.stable
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 12/08/2026 10:58, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> mv64xxx_i2c_probe() calls pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(), but the probe
> failure and remove paths do not call the matching
> pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() before disabling runtime PM.
> 
> If the autosuspend delay is set to a negative value while autosuspend
> is enabled, the runtime PM core increments usage_count to prevent
> runtime suspend. Without undoing the autosuspend setting during
> teardown, this reference is not dropped and usage_count remains
> unbalanced.
> 
> Call pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() in both the probe failure and
> remove paths before disabling runtime PM to properly undo the
> autosuspend setting.
> 
> This issue was found by manual code inspection.
> 
> Fixes: e5c02cf54154 ("i2c: mv64xxx: Add runtime PM support")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Srsly, one more separate I2C posting, just like you did for dma, crypto,
drm and everywhere else. You seriously waste our time.

You sent vast amount of patches, all separate, making it very difficult
to track and respond in efficient way. Do not do that.

Group your work per subsystem.

You were asked to clarify and respond to incorrect fixes statement. I do
not see how you clarified and responded at all.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.