Re: [PATCH 00/21] Initial cleanups for vCPU hotplug
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Fri, 1 Dec 2023 12:28:59 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-ia64,dev.linux.lists.kvmarm,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-arch,org.kernel.vger.linux-csky,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-parisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2023120131-leotard-deprecate-4e27@gregkh> |
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 12:25:54PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Russell! > > On Tue, Nov 21 2023 at 13:43, Russell King wrote: > > This series aims to switch most architectures over to using generic CPU > > devices rather than arch specific implementations, which I think is > > worthwhile doing even if the vCPU hotplug series needs further work. > > I went through the whole series and I can't find anything > objectionable. > > Vs. merging: It does not make sense to split this up and route > individual patches. > > So I can pick the whole pile up and route it through tip smp/core unless > Rafael or Greg prefer to take it through one of their trees. For the > latter case: > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> > > Greg, Rafael? I can take them, will do so this weekend when I catch up on patches on a 14+ hour flight... greg k-h