Re: [PATCH RFC v3 07/21] ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init and remove pre-processor guards

"Russell King (Oracle)" <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Dec 2023 18:03:47 +0000
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-ia64,dev.linux.lists.acpica-devel,dev.linux.lists.kvmarm,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-arch,org.kernel.vger.linux-csky,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-parisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 05:43:37PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:49:47 +0000
> Russell King (Oracle) <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > From: James Morse <[email protected]>
> > 
> > acpi_processor_hotadd_init() will make a CPU present by mapping it
> > based on its hardware id.
> > 
> > 'hotadd_init' is ambiguous once there are two different behaviours
> > for cpu hotplug. This is for toggling the _STA present bit. Subsequent
> > patches will add support for toggling the _STA enabled bit, named
> > acpi_processor_make_enabled().
> > 
> > Rename it acpi_processor_make_present() to make it clear this is
> > for CPUs that were not previously present.
> > 
> > Expose the function prototypes it uses to allow the preprocessor
> > guards to be removed. The IS_ENABLED() check will let the compiler
> > dead-code elimination pass remove this if it isn't going to be
> > used.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: James Morse <[email protected]>
> > Tested-by: Miguel Luis <[email protected]>
> > Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <[email protected]>
> > Tested-by: Jianyong Wu <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Outstanding comments:
> >  https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> 
> If it's not caused a build warning yet, chances are high this is fine.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
> 
> >  https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> >   For this comment, we use IS_ENABLED() in multiple places in the kernel in
> >   this way, and it isn't a problem.

Yes, for both of these comments, I think they aren't something that
needs any action - these patches have been published in my tree since
October, and that is subject to the kernel build bot which hasn't found
any issues.

So, I'll add your r-b, add my s-o-b, and remove the "outstanding
comments" from this patch.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!