Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iio: light: gp2ap002: Fix unbalanced runtime PM on repeated event writes
Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260725015245.5f911412@jic23-huawei> |
On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:52:45 +0530 Nikhil Gautam <[email protected]> wrote: > The IIO core does not filter duplicate writes to the event enable > attribute, so writing the same value twice invokes > write_event_config() twice. Enabling twice leaks a runtime PM > reference, preventing the device from ever suspending again; > disabling twice underflows the usage count and triggers a > "Runtime PM usage count underflow" warning. > > Bail out early when the requested state matches the current state. > While at it, switch to pm_runtime_resume_and_get() so a failed > resume is propagated to userspace instead of silently marking the > event enabled. > > Fixes: 97d642e23037c ("iio: light: Add a driver for Sharp GP2AP002x00F") > Signed-off-by: Nikhil Gautam <[email protected]> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260722162247.8229-1-nikhilgtr%40gmail.com Sashiko raises a point about concurrent accessors. My previous understanding was that we were fine if there was only a single file involved. Having dug around a bit I'm fairly sure that is correct. The comment here implying to me that we are fine. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1.4/source/fs/kernfs/file.c#L340 Now if we had more than one file then we couldn't rely on this. Hence to me it's a bit fragile and we should probably add a local lock anyway. One other comment inline. > --- > drivers/iio/light/gp2ap002.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/gp2ap002.c b/drivers/iio/light/gp2ap002.c > index 42859e5b1089..966459994995 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/light/gp2ap002.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/gp2ap002.c > @@ -343,6 +343,10 @@ static int gp2ap002_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > bool state) > { > struct gp2ap002 *gp2ap002 = iio_priv(indio_dev); > + int ret; > + > + if (state == gp2ap002->enabled) > + return 0; > > if (state) { > /* > @@ -350,14 +354,15 @@ static int gp2ap002_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > * already) and reintialize the sensor by using runtime_pm > * callbacks. > */ > - pm_runtime_get_sync(gp2ap002->dev); > - gp2ap002->enabled = true; > + > + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(gp2ap002->dev); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > } else { > - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(gp2ap002->dev); > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(gp2ap002->dev); > - gp2ap002->enabled = false; > } > > + gp2ap002->enabled = state; > return 0; > } >