Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: dac: dac8163: Add driver for DAC8163

"Siratul Islam" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
July 26, 2026 at 8:10 PM, "Lukas" <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]?to=%22Lukas%22%20%3Clukas.metz%40gmx.net%3E > wrote:


> 
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 09:58:13PM +0600, Siratul Islam wrote:
> 
> > 
> > +
> >  + const struct reg_default reg_defaults[] = {
> >  + {
> >  + .reg = CMD_SET(CMD_WRITE_UPDATE, 0),
> >  + .def = info->default_output_reg,
> >  + },
> >  + {
> >  + .reg = CMD_SET(CMD_WRITE_UPDATE, 1),
> >  + .def = info->default_output_reg,
> >  + },
> >  + };
> >  +
> >  + const struct regmap_config regmap_config = {
> >  + .reg_bits = 8,
> >  + .val_bits = 16,
> >  +
> >  + .max_register = CMD_REF << 3,
> >  + .cache_type = REGCACHE_MAPLE,
> >  +
> >  + .volatile_reg = dac8163_reg_false,
> >  +
> >  + .reg_defaults = reg_defaults,
> >  + .num_reg_defaults = ARRAY_SIZE(reg_defaults),
> >  + };
> >  Why are these defined inside probe? Should be defined outside the function.
> > 
> The default values after reset are different for the compatible devices
> (0 for the dacxxx2 devices and mid-scale for the dacxxx3 devices).
> So these are runtime dependent. The alternative would be to have two
> regmap_configs for the two device types and add these to the chip_info.
> Or do you have another suggestion?
You don't need two regmap_configs. The way I would do it is, move the "regmap_config" out of probe and name it something 
like "dac8563_regmap_config". And in chip info struct, replace "default_output_reg" with "reg_defaults[]". 
Then for each "dacxxxx_chip_info" define the appropriate "reg_defaults" configuration.

This way you can do

struct regmap_config regmap_config = dac8563_regmap_config;
...
regmap_config.reg_defaults = info->reg_defaults;
regmap_config.num_reg_defaults = ARRAY_SIZE(info->reg_defaults);

A bit of work, but it would ensure most of the work is done at compile time,
and we avoid reconstructing these sructs everytime probe runs.

> 
> Best regards
> 
> Lukas
>
--
Best regards,
Sirat
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.