Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add TI ADS126x ADC family
David Lechner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/26/26 2:49 PM, Kurt Borja wrote: > On Tue Jun 30, 2026 at 7:28 PM -05, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Jun 2026 13:38:30 -0500 >> David Lechner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 6/30/26 12:14 PM, Kurt Borja wrote: >>>> On Mon Jun 29, 2026 at 11:43 AM -05, David Lechner wrote: >>>>> On 6/29/26 11:27 AM, Kurt Borja wrote: >>>>>> On Mon Jun 29, 2026 at 9:21 AM -05, David Lechner wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/28/26 2:12 PM, Kurt Borja wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun Jun 28, 2026 at 10:45 AM -05, David Lechner wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/28/26 12:36 AM, Kurt Borja wrote: >>>>>>>>>> The ADS1262 and ADS1263 are 32-bit, 38.4-kSPS delta-sigma ADCs with an >>>>>>>>>> integrated PGA, internal reference, excitation and burn-out current >>>>>>>>>> sources for sensor biasing and diagnostics. The ADS1263 adds a second, >>>>>>>>>> 24-bit delta-sigma ADC (ADC2) for background measurements. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>>> +patternProperties: >>>>>>>>>> + "^channel@[0-9]+$": >>>>>>>>>> + $ref: /schemas/iio/adc/adc.yaml# >>>>>>>>>> + unevaluatedProperties: false >>>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>>> + properties: >>>>>>>>>> + reg: >>>>>>>>>> + maxItems: 1 >>>>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If we want to allow single-ended/pseudo-differential inputs, then we should >>>>>>>>> also allow single-channel (positive pin) and common-mode-channel (negative >>>>>>>>> pin) properties. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This will also require additional common-mode-<N>-supply properties to allow >>>>>>>>> for the negative pin connected to something other than GND. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ah interesting. Why the N though? wouldn't a single supply connected to >>>>>>>> AINCOM be enough here? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In theory, any AINx could be a common mode input by connecting it to >>>>>>> a constant voltage supply. >>>>>> >>>>>> Technically yes, but there is a pin named AINCOM intended for this >>>>>> purpose. Can we do a simplification here? I propose having >>>>>> >>>>>> common-mode-channel: >>>>>> /* AINCOM pin */ >>>>>> const: 10 >>>>>> >>>>>> That way we would only need one common-mode-supply. Would that be okay? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ideally, we shouldn't limit how the chip can be wired up in the devicetree >>>>> bindings. It doesn't mean that we have to implement everything in the driver >>>>> though. >> >> I'm a bit confused on this. Arguably you could wire up any side of a differential >> pair to a common mode signal, but we haven't had this binding applied more generally >> than cases where their is a setup where the intent is a shared common (shielding >> on cable in some cases IIRC). >> >> So why is this case special? I see AIN_COM can be wired up to an internal vbias >> but other than that it looks like any other AINX input. > > Hi, > > I forgot to respond to this email! > > As you said, there is nothing special about AINCOM, it's just like any > other input. That's why David suggested to have a common-mode-N-supply > for each input. > > I implemented this of course, but I still have doubts because there is > no precedent for something like this in IIO. I understand the logic, but FWIW, we have 4 ainx-supply properties on adi,ad7380. > I'll personally be inclined to drop it. If there is no further > discussion I'll keep the 10 common-mode supplies. To make the bindings less verbose, we could use: patternProperties: ain[0-9]-supply: description: fixed voltage input when AIN pin is used as common mode > > I'm finishing v3 and I'll submit it in a couple of days. > >> >> Jonathan >> >>>> >>>> Makes sense. >>>> >>>> I just have a doubt: In the ADS112c14 bindings, is there a specific >>>> reason why you didn't describe common-mode-<N>-supply? >>>> >>> >>> For singled-ended inputs on ADS112c14, there is an internal >>> connection to GND, so it isn't possible to have a pseudo- >>> differential input like that. I guess technically, it could >>> still be possible, but wasn't a typical wiring described in >>> the datasheet like it is on ADS1263. >>> >