Re: [PATCH] iio: light: tsl2772: fix ALS calibscale readback
Yuanshen Cao <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ambhLVO6CkMVzqKJ@45fec588b341> |
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 03:14:07AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:46:01 +0000 > Yuanshen Cao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The read_raw() implementation uses IIO_LIGHT to distinguish between the > > ambient light and proximity channels when handling > > IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE. > > > > However, the ALS channel is registered as IIO_INTENSITY, while > > write_raw() correctly writes to IIO_INTENSITY. As a result, reading > > in_intensity0_calibscale incorrectly returns the proximity gain instead > > of the ALS gain. > > > > This causes the following user-visible behavior: > > - Writing in_intensity0_calibscale appears to have no effect because the > > readback reports the proximity gain. > > - Writing in_proximity0_calibscale causes both in_proximity0_calibscale > > and in_intensity0_calibscale to report the same value. > > > > Fix this by checking for IIO_INTENSITY in read_raw(), matching the > > channel definition and the existing write_raw() implementation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yuanshen Cao <[email protected]> > Hi, > > Fix looks good and the explanation correct. Was this an AI found > one, or did you either spot this whilst reading the code or best > of all saw it in practice and went looking for what is wrong? Hi Jonathan, It's actually a bit of both. I first noticed the strange calibscale behavior while testing a device with this sensor. Since most part of this driver has been around for 7+ years, I wasn't expecting to find a bug there. I asked ChatGPT for some ideas about what might explain the behavior, and it pointed out the mismatch. I then went back and verified it, and sure enough, it turned out to be a 14-year-old bug. After that, I checked the rest of the file for similar issues, but this appears to be the only instance. Also this was tested on the device and it works as intended now. > Give it is fix, what is missing is a suitable Fixes tag. > Please see if you can figure out what that should be. > No need to send a v2 unless anything else comes up in review. > Just reply to this thread with the Fixes tag so I'll get it > when I use b4 to pick up the patch Thanks for pointing this out. The missing tag is: Fixes: 3c97c08b5735 ("iio: light: add TAOS tsl2x7x driver") Best, Yuanshen (Alex) Cao > Thanks, > > Jonathan > > > --- > > drivers/iio/light/tsl2772.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/tsl2772.c b/drivers/iio/light/tsl2772.c > > index 244f44379c36..2287585711c6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iio/light/tsl2772.c > > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/tsl2772.c > > @@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@ static int tsl2772_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > > } > > break; > > case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE: > > - if (chan->type == IIO_LIGHT) > > + if (chan->type == IIO_INTENSITY) > > *val = tsl2772_als_gain[chip->settings.als_gain]; > > else > > *val = tsl2772_prox_gain[chip->settings.prox_gain]; > > > > --- > > base-commit: 1590cf0329716306e948a8fc29f1d3ee87d3989f > > change-id: 20260724-tsl2772-calibscale-fix-0cc42518d5fc > > > > Best regards, > > -- > > Yuanshen Cao <[email protected]> > > >