Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: pac1921: fix wrong channel used in trigger handler read
Matteo Martelli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 14:12:46 +0700, Cong Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > pac1921_trigger_handler() walks the enabled channels with > iio_for_each_active_channel(), which yields the scan index (bit) of each > active channel, while ch is a separate counter used to pack the samples > contiguously into the scan buffer. > > The register to read was looked up with the packing counter instead of > the scan index: > > ret = pac1921_read_res(priv, idev->channels[ch].address, &val); > > pac1921_channels[] is ordered by scan index, so channels[bit] is the > channel that is actually enabled, whereas channels[ch] is merely the > ch-th array entry. These coincide only when the enabled channels form a > contiguous prefix (e.g. all channels enabled). With a sparse scan mask - > for example when only the power channel (scan index 3) is enabled - the > handler reads the wrong register (VBUS instead of VPOWER) and pushes it > to userspace as the enabled channel's data. > > Index the channel array by the scan index (bit) to read the correct > register, keeping ch only for contiguous packing into the scan buffer. > > Fixes: 371f778b83cd ("iio: adc: add support for pac1921") > Cc: [email protected] > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4 > Signed-off-by: Cong Nguyen <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c b/drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c > index bce7185953ec..0037509503ed 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/pac1921.c > @@ -1037,7 +1037,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pac1921_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p) > iio_for_each_active_channel(idev, bit) { > u16 val; > > - ret = pac1921_read_res(priv, idev->channels[ch].address, &val); > + ret = pac1921_read_res(priv, idev->channels[bit].address, &val); > if (ret) > goto done; > > -- > 2.25.1 > This looks correct to me. I guess I didn't test it properly with a subset of enabled channels when I wrote this. Thanks for the fix! Acked-by: Matteo Martelli <[email protected]>