Re: [PATCH] iio: accel: fxls8962af: clamp FIFO sample count

Joshua Crofts <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.stable
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 06 Aug 2026 05:14:53 +0800
"Shengzhuo Wei" <[email protected]> wrote:

> fxls8962af_fifo_flush() copies the number of samples the device reports
> in its FIFO status register into an on-stack buffer
> 
> 	u16 buffer[FXLS8962AF_FIFO_LENGTH * 3];
> 
> which is sized for at most FXLS8962AF_FIFO_LENGTH (32) samples. The
> sample count is read from the BUF_STATUS register and only masked to its
> 6 valid bits:
> 
> 	count = reg & FXLS8962AF_BUF_STATUS_BUF_CNT;
> 
> so it can be 0..63, while the buffer holds 32. The only other limit,
> the watermark, is applied on the write path (fxls8962af_set_watermark)
> but not here on the read path. count samples are then transferred into
> buffer[]:
> 
> 	fxls8962af_fifo_transfer(data, buffer, count);
> 
> fxls8962af_fifo_transfer() reads count * 6 bytes through regmap, so a
> malfunctioning, malicious or counterfeit accelerometer (or an attacker
> tampering with the I2C/SPI bus) that reports up to 63 samples writes up
> to 378 bytes into the 192-byte buffer: a stack out-of-bounds write of up
> to 186 bytes that clobbers the stack canary, saved registers and the
> return address.
> 
> Clamp count to FXLS8962AF_FIFO_LENGTH, the number of samples buffer[] is
> sized for, before the transfer, mirroring the watermark clamp already
> done in fxls8962af_set_watermark(). A well-formed flush reports at most
> FXLS8962AF_FIFO_LENGTH samples, so legitimate devices are unaffected.
> 
> Fixes: 79e3a5bdd9ef ("iio: accel: fxls8962af: add hw buffered sampling")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Assisted-by: GLM:5.2
> Signed-off-by: Shengzhuo Wei <[email protected]>
> ---

Makes sense.

Reviewed-by: Joshua Crofts <[email protected]>

-- 
Kind regards,
Joshua Crofts
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.